| |
In Memoriam: Abe Fortas
Rex Lee*
Abe Fortas, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of
the United States from 1965 to 1969, died at his home
in Washington, D.C. on April 5, 1982. He was 71 years
old, but even for a man whose career had been so rich,
so varied and so fruitful, his death cannot be said to
have come in the fullness of time. Only a few days before,
he had argued before the Supreme Court and neither his
appetite for work nor his powers showed any signs of diminishing.
To recall the details of his life is to exhibit, as the
historian Burckhardt said, only the "underside of
the tapestry": the knots and stitches, not the whole
work. Abe Fortas was animated by a warmth, a compassion,
a profound gravity that could be felt, that cannot be
captured in words, but that made him who he was and whom
we remember.
Abe Fortas was born in Memphis, Tennessee on June 19,
1910. His Orthodox Jewish parents had emigrated from England.
His father was a cabinetmaker who was also a sometime
shopkeeper and jeweler. Abe was the youngest of five children,
and his family's modest circumstances dictated that any
achievement he enjoyed would be self-made. He worked his
way through high school by playing the violin in a small
dance band. The violin began as a source of pleasure,
became a means of self-support along with part-time work
in a shoe store, and remained a passion throughout his
life. His academic record led to a scholarship at Southwestern
College, a Presbyterian institution in Memphis. There
he was president of the drama and debating clubs and leader
of the school orchestra. With a near-perfect academic
record, he won a scholarship to the Yale Law School, which
he entered in 1930 at the age of 20.
Propitious circumstances and the relentless application
of his remarkable ability made Yale the turning point
of Fortas' life. He led his class academically, was Editor-in-Chief
of the Law Journal, and authored a brilliant student note
at the direction of William 0. Douglas, then a young Sterling
Professor of Law, who would later call Fortas "my
prize student" and who would become an intimate friend
for life.
Fortas was appointed assistant professor of law upon his
graduation in 1933, but for the next four years his world
had two centers, New Haven and Washington. During summers
and semesters when he was not teaching, he worked at the
Agricultural Adjustment Administration at the behest of
two other Yale faculty members who had been drawn by the
New Deal, Thurman Arnold and Wesley Sturges. In 1934,
Fortas joined Douglas at the new Securities and Exchange
Commission as a consultant. He became an important collaborator
with Douglas in the preparation of a study of protective
committees that led to major legislative revisions in
reorganization proceedings under the Bankruptcy Act. Three
years after joining the Commission, Fortas left the Yale
faculty In the meantime, he had married Carolyn Agger.
She, too, became a brilliant student at the Yale Law School
and after her graduation in 1933, began an outstanding
career as a tax lawyer that has continued to the present
day.
In 1939, at the age of 29, Fortas became General Counsel
to the Bituminous Coal Division of the Department of the
Interior. Two years later, he became Director of the Division
of Power in the Department. In that capacity, he met a
young congressman named Lyndon B. Johnson, who was interested
in a proposed power project in his home state of Texas.
The introduction led to a life-long friendship which included
Fortas’ representation Johnson in the contested
Texas Senatorial election of 1948.
Talented young men, of whom Fortas was one of the best,
were able to rise quickly in the New Deal. In 1942 at
the age of 32, Fortas became Under Secretary of the Interior.
His legal abilities had been firmly established. In the
new post, he demonstrated the judgment and force required
to become a successful second in command to Secretary
Harold Ickes, the self-styled curmudgeon of the Roosevelt
administration. Fortas won Ickes' trust so quickly and
to such a degree that he frequently substituted for the
secretary at Cabinet meetings.
With the declaration of war after Pearl Harbor, the business
of the Interior Department acquired new gravity. The Department
was charged with administering the removal of Japanese
Americans from the West Coast and with overseeing the
administration of martial law in the Hawaiian Territory
Fortas fought a determined, though unsuccessful battle
to prevent the relocation and internment of the Japanese-Americans.
In later years he would tell associates that he was prouder
of his efforts in that cause than in any other he undertook
in more than a decade of government service. And with
Ickes, he also fought to ameliorate the harshest aspects
of martial law in Hawaii during the war.
Fortas' tenure in the Interior Department was briefly
interrupted when he resigned to enlist as an apprentice
seaman in the Navy. Rejecting any high-level desk assignment
in the service, he was in boot camp when a persistent
and serious eye ailment compelled his release; he was
reappointed to his still-vacant post as Under Secretary.
When the war ended, so did the New Deal. In January 1946,
the law firm of Arnold and Fortas was organized in Washington,
D.C. Its purpose, as Fortas later recalled in a tribute
to Thurman Arnold, "was to provide a means for its
two partners to make a living." For almost 20 years,
Fortas managed the firm and built it into one of the leading
institutions in the city and in the country Two of Fortas'
most important victories were for clients whom he represented
by court appointment. His representation of Monte Durham
in 1954 by appointment of the United States Court of Appeals
for the District of Columbia Circuit, led to a decision
that for its time was a landmark in the modern attempt
to bring into closer proximity legal rules and scientific
knowledge concerning insanity Less than a decade later,
again by appointment of the court, he convinced the Supreme
Court that Clarence Earl Gideon was entitled under the
Constitution to a lawyer to defend him in state court
for a petty offense. Both cases were constitutional watersheds.
Abe Fortas was an advocate not only of the powerful and
the penniless, but also of the arts. If his professional
passion was craftsmanship, his private passion was music
and art. The two merged symbolically in the form of his
desk at the firm which was made from a Victorian grand
piano. He was an effective supporter of the National Endowments
for the Arts and for the Humanities. He arranged for Pablo
Casals to play at the White House, and in later years
he helped direct the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing
Arts.
He once said that the only thing he could not live without
was his music. Though he played for pleasure, his musical
sense and skill were of a high order, and he played the
violin and viola regularly with the talented professionals
who were his friends in the Sunday evening sessions at
his home that he called "the 3025 N Street Strictly
No Refund Quartet." A month after Fortas' death violinist
Isaac Stern led a memorial concert at the Kennedy Center
in memory of the man who worked to make the Kennedy Center
a vital force in the arts, who with Stern, successfully
fought the destruction of Carnegie Hall and who helped
make the Hirschhorn Museum a reality.
Abe Fortas was a man of rare completeness—patron
and practitioner of the arts, successful corporate lawyer
and superb advocate, defender of the poor and the persecuted.
His legal renown came as "Washington lawyer"
but not of the breed sometimes thought to provide clients
with income more than advice. Fortas knew Washington from
the inside, but his success rested on an intuitive knowledge
built from the ground up of how bureaucracies worked and
thus, how they needed to be addressed. When an elevator
car carrying lawyers, judges and administrators was trapped
between floors in the Export-Import Bank on the way to
a meeting, Fortas opened the operator's panel, pulled
a lever, flicked a switch or two and the car was once
again on its way. When his fellow passengers expressed
their astonishment, Fortas replied with the mock innocence
he occasionally affected, "It's really quite simple,
for an insider."
Abe Fortas was not eager to accept appointment to the
Court, but President Johnson styled the nomination as
a call to "vital duty" and Fortas accepted.
The President, noting Fortas' well-known reluctance to
assume public office again after 20 years in private life,
declared that "the job has sought the man—a
scholar, a profound thinker, a lawyer of superior ability
and a man of deeply compassionate feelings toward his
fellow man."
Justice Fortas took the constitutional and judicial oaths
on October 4, 1965 to become the 95th justice to sit on
the Supreme Court of the United States. In the four terms
that he sat as an Associate Justice he wrote 106 opinions—40
opinions for the Court, 21 concurrences and 45 dissents.
His importance to the Court and to the nation during the
perilous times in which he sat cannot be measured by output.
Part of his value lay, as Holmes said of John Marshall
fore that he would retire as soon as his successor was
confirmed. The nomination never went to a vote in the
Senate because Fortas asked on October 3 that his name
be withdrawn from consideration after stormy confirmation
hearings where questions were raised about decisions made
by the Court both before and during his tenure, and about
Fortas' extrajudicial activities. To Fortas, the political
implications of the controversy transcended personal vindication.
He knew, as he said, that, "If I stayed on the Court,
there would be a constitutional confrontation that would
go on for months. I felt there wasn't any choice for a
man of conscience." Against the urgings of friends
and those who recognized the importance of his contribution
to the work of the Court, he resigned from the Court on
May 14, 1969.
After the resignation, Abe Fortas resumed an active practice
as an eminent and valuable member of the bar. The practice
was remarkably varied, challenging and consuming. Of particular
interest to him was the future of the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico, with which he had a long association and
which he represented in his only argument before the Court
after leaving it. He continued his manifold activities
on behalf of the arts, and he occasionally lectured. Although
his work and his avocation seemed to fill a 25-hour day,
he always had time for his friends.
The life of Abe Fortas was so full, so rich and lived
at such intensity that it is possible we do not fully
know the man we have lost. He recognized his own complexity
"The Supreme Court," he said, "brings you
face to face with the problems of what you really believe,
and that accounts for some of the transformations of men
on the Court. Maybe if I'd stayed on the Court long enough
I'd have discovered a Fortas under the Fortas under the
Fortas. But it didn't happen."
Abe Fortas was not so much a man of contradictions as
a man of great tensions. An instinctive, emotional passion
for justice and fair play underlay his quiet and controlled
public reserve; the man who moved so easily in the corridors
of power was acutely uncomfortable with the trappings
of that power, so much so that he could not bear to ride
in the back seat of a limousine alone because he detested
the distinction between the passenger and the driver such
seating symbolized; and the active and diverse social
life that he and his wife so enjoyed was at odds with
his lifelong gravity and social concern.
Abe Fortas bore the burden of the same kind of conscience
that he perceived in his friend and former partner, Louis
Eisenstein: "He believed in man and man's capability
He believed—although life could not have been easy
for him because he was a sensitive instrument responding
too easily, too deeply, too quietly, too passionately
to the vibrations of others—not only those whom
he knew, whose sorrows impinged upon his life, but also
to the unseen multitudes whose problems to him were not
abstract, but a personal agony and a personal responsibility"
As he said of Eisenstein in that deep, deliberate, somewhat
mournful voice which none who heard it can ever forget,
"The death of a remarkable man is not just an end.
It is also a beginning. His death does not terminate his
life. His life continues in each of those whom he has
touched, and in thousands whom he never encountered, but
whose lives are better and richer because he lived."
* * * * * *
* Reprinted from the Solicitor General's remarks before
the Supreme Court of the United States during the Special
Session in memory of Justice Fortas on December 13, 1982.
* * * * * *
|