Under new
Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson, the Supreme Court again
reviewed a conviction. In this case, a jury had found
Hans Max Haupt, a naturalized citizen, guilty of treason.
Haupts son, Herbert, one of eight originally convicted
saboteurs, had already been executed. Witnesses swore
that Hans Haupt had sheltered his son for six days in
his Chicago apartment; he had helped him buy a car;
he had helped him try to get back a job at a plant making
lenses for the secret Norden bombsight. All these actions
were harmless, even if proved, Haupts lawyers
argued.
Again
Justice Robert H. Jackson wrote the majority opinion.
The trial judge had properly instructed the jury, he
said, to decide if Hans Haupt meant only to help his
son or if he meant to help Germany against the United
States. The jury had found him a traitor, and in law
they had sufficient evidence.
Meanwhile,
in another long series of decisions, the Court was defining
the constitutional rules for fair criminal trials in
state courts.
Held for
days against Indiana law, questioned for hours by relays
of policemen, a man named Watts finally said something
that convicted him of murder; in 1949 the Court ruled
that such coercion also denies due processif a
mans own words may cost his life he must speak
at his own choice.
As the United
States entered the second half of the twentieth century,
forces were gathering which would lead in a few short
years to a historic reversal. Since 1896 the "separate
but equal" doctrine upheld by the Supreme Court
in Plessy v. Ferguson had been the law of the
land; under it many states and the District of Columbia
had operated racially segregated school systems.
The
beginnings of change were deceptively modest. In 1951
Oliver Brown of Topeka, Kansas, sued the city school
board in behalf of his eight-year-old daughter Linda
Carol. She had to cross railroad yards to catch the
bus for a black school 21 blocks away; her father wanted
her in the white school only five blocks from home.
Linda
Brown Smith, Ethel Louise Belton Brown, Harry
Briggs, Jr., and Spottswood Bolling, Jr., all
plaintiffs in school desegregation cases, in 1964
~
Library
of Congress
|
|
Eight-year
old Linda Brown who crossed railroad tracks to
take a bus 21 blocks to a black school when there
was a white school five blocks from her home ~
AP/Wide
World |
Three
federal judges heard testimony on teachers, courses
of study, buildings; they heard lawyers for Brown and
12 other black parents argue that the Kansas law permitting
segregation violated the Fourteenth Amendment. Finding
the schools substantially equal, the judges ruled against
Brown; they said that Plessy controlled the case.
Ten-year-old
Harry Briggs, Jr., and 66 other black children had filed
a similar suit, through their parents, against school
authorities in Clarendon County, South Carolina. The
County was spending $395,000 for 2,375 white pupils,
$282,000 for 6,531 black pupils. All the white students
had desks; two black schools had no desks at all.
The
federal court that heard the Briggs case ordered
Clarendon County to "equalize" its schools
as soon as possible; but, relying on Plessy,
it refused to order black pupils admitted to white schools,
or to rule South Carolinas segregation law invalid.
The
Supreme Court heard argument in December 1952, on the
Brown and the Briggs cases, combining
them with an almost identical case from Prince Edward
County, Virginia, and one from Delaware.
Delawares
court of equity had found separate black schools inferior
and ordered black children transferred to white schools
at once; its highest court had sustained the order,
and school officials had sought review in the Supreme
Court.
Briefs
for all the black litigants included data from psychologists
and social scientists. Since Louis D. Brandeis filed
his famous brief for Oregon in 1908, lawyers had offered
"non-legal" facts to defend a challenged law;
now they offered such material to attack state laws.
Records from the lower courts printed the testimony
of expert witnesses explaining why they thought legal
segregation harmed black children.
In June
1953, the Court ordered a reargument.. Then, on September
8, Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson, aged 63, died unexpectedly
of a heart attack. President Eisenhower moved promptly
to appoint his successor, Earl Warren, the popular Governor
of California.
| |
|
The
Vinson Court ~
Supreme Court of the United States
|